The content has been provided by a third party not affiliated with E*TRADE. The material is for educational purposes only.
It's a rare newbie investor who has the financial wherewithal--and foresight--to hit the ground running on a retirement savings plan, making the maximum allowable IRA and 401(k) contributions at the same time she's getting her career off the ground.
Instead, most investors tiptoe into retirement savings. They might start with token investments in their 401(k) plans (or get opted into them, if they're not paying attention). Then, as their finances allow or if they're dissatisfied with their 401(k)s, they "graduate" into other investment vehicles for their retirement nest eggs, such as IRAs and taxable accounts.
One question investors often ask is, if they have a fixed sum of money to invest every month or every year, how should they deploy that cash for their retirement savings? Which receptacle gives them the biggest bang for their buck?
As with many financial-planning questions, there are no one-size-fits-all answers: Variations in investors' company retirement plans, tax situations, and time horizons mean that a retirement-savings hierarchy that makes sense for one individual may not add up for another.
That said, the following framework for retirement savings will be a good starting point for many investors. (Note that this hierarchy does not factor in nonretirement financial goals, such as amassing an emergency fund, saving for college, or investing for short- and intermediate-term financials.)
Stop 1: Invest enough in 401(k)/other company retirement plan to earn matching contributions.
Why prioritize it: To take advantage of free money.
De-prioritize if: An investor’s401(k) offers no matching contributions. In that case, proceed directly to Stop 2.
Even if a company's match is lackluster--say, $0.25 on every dollar invested--it's going to be difficult to out-earn that rate of return by investing outside of the 401(k) (or 403(b) or 457 plan). And remember: Those matching contributions are in addition to any investment earnings. Thus, the first stop for individuals just starting out is to contribute at least enough to earn the full match. If the company provides a match of $0.50 for every dollar invested, up to 6% of pay, the employee should target a 401(k) contribution of at least 6%, too.
Stop 2: Invest in an IRA.
Why prioritize it: Low costs, flexibility, the ability to contribute to a Roth.
De-prioritize if: An investor’s company retirement plan features all the bells and whistles, including ultralow costs and a Roth option. Alternatively, if an investor needs the legal protections of a 401(k). In any of those instances, contribute the maximum to the 401(k) before funding an IRA.
It doesn't get much simpler than making contributions to a 401(k) plan: The money comes out of the investor's paycheck, like it or not. Moreover, IRAs enjoy no special tax advantages over 401(k)s. So, why bother with an IRA? Why not fill up that 401(k) to the max, assuming you can spare the $18,000 maximum allowable contribution ($24,000 for savers older than 50)?
Costs are one of the key reasons: Many 401(k) plans feature a layer of administrative fees, whereas investors buying into an IRA can invest without that layer. (Investors with very small IRAs may, however, be on the hook for account-maintenance fees.) And while 401(k) investors are typically wedded to a specific menu of investment choices, some of which may be high-cost, IRA investors are free to invest in a broad gamut of securities, including ultralow-cost index funds or exchange-traded funds. Additionally, some individuals simply cannot contribute to a 401(k) because their employers don't offer one.
Finally, not all 401(k) plans offer a Roth option, whereas all IRA investors have the option to contribute to a Roth. High earners will need to go in through the "backdoor".
Of course--and here's one of the big exceptions to the hierarchy--some 401(k) plans are rock-solid, featuring no layer of administrative expenses, extra-low-cost investment options, and a full range of features, including the ability to make Roth contributions. If an investor’s 401(k) plan ticks all of those boxes, he or she can consider and making a full 401(k) contribution before moving to an IRA.
Stop 2a: Invest in a spousal IRA.
Why prioritize it: Amass retirement savings for nonearning spouse.
De-prioritize if: The 401(k) of the spouse with earnings is rock-solid; in that case, fully funding that 401(k) plan could reasonably come before funding IRAs for either spouse.
For married couples with a nonearning spouse, funding a spousal IRA should come next in the hierarchy. Assuming the earning spouse has enough income to cover both her contribution and that of her spouse, the nonearning spouse can accumulate retirement savings in his name and also help build up the couple's joint retirement nest egg. Because nonearning spouses don't have the opportunity to contribute to company retirement-savings vehicles such as 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and 457 plans, the spousal IRA is the only game in town.
Stop 3: Invest in company retirement plan up to the limit.
Why prioritize it: The ability to enjoy tax-free contributions and tax-deferred compounding (traditional), or tax-free compounding and withdrawals (Roth).
De-prioritize if: An investor has plenty of assets in accounts that will be taxed upon withdrawal and the investor is close to retirement. If that's the case, an investor may want to prioritize saving in a taxable (nonretirement) account instead of maxing out the company retirement plan. Ditto, if there's a chance the investor will need the money before retirement.
For higher-income investors who have significant assets to invest toward their retirement savings, taking advantage of all tax-sheltered retirement-savings options should precede investing in nonretirement accounts. And that's true even if the 401(k), 403(b), or 457 plan isn't best of breed. Investors in traditional 401(k)s contribute pretax dollars and enjoy tax-deferred compounding; further, making pretax contributions reduces adjusted gross income, thereby increasing eligibility for valuable credits and deductions. Investors in Roth 401(k)s, meanwhile, enjoy tax-free compounding and tax-free withdrawals in retirement. Those tax benefits are the key reason that investing in a 401(k)--even one that's subpar--trumps investing in a taxable account.
However, it's worth noting that the benefits of investing in a 401(k) are magnified over longer time horizons; investors who are close to retirement will benefit less from the tax deferral of a traditional 401(k) simply because the money will have less time to compound in the account. Moreover, such investors may value tax diversification in retirement. By investing in a taxable account, they'll be able to avoid required minimum distributions and pay capital gains taxes--rather than ordinary income taxes--when they eventually withdraw the money. If that's the case, they may want to prioritize investing in a taxable (nonretirement) account over making additional 401(k) contributions as they get close to retirement.
Stop 4: Make aftertax 401(k) contributions to the limit.
Why prioritize it: The ability to enhance a portfolio's share of Roth assets, eventually--provided the 401(k) plan allows for the contribution of aftertax dollars.
De-prioritize if: The 401(k) is especially poor or especially good.
Investors who have already made the maximum 401(k) contribution of $18,000 ($24,000 if older than 50) can contribute at an even higher level--up to $54,000 in total contributions in 2017--provided their plans allow for contributions of after-tax 401(k) dollars. Those after-tax 401(k) contributions can eventually be converted to Roth IRA assets once the investor has retired, left the company, or is taking in-service distributions from their plans.
Such contributions will tend to be less attractive for investors who have particularly poor or costly 401(k) plans; the costs of investing in a very poor plan have the potential to erode the eventual tax savings associated with having more Roth assets.
Stop 5: Invest in taxable account.
Why prioritize it: An investor aiming for tax diversification in retirement and already have a sizable share of his or her assets in tax-deferred and Roth accounts. Ditto if there's a chance the investor will need to take out their money before retirement or they expect to be in the 0% tax bracket for capital gains when they withdraw your money.
De-prioritize if: The investor has not yet taken advantage of tax-advantaged accounts that are available to them and they have a long time horizon for their money.
Investing inside of a taxable (nonretirement) account offers the most possible flexibility, albeit without the tax breaks that accompany the aforementioned investment wrappers. Not only can you invest in nearly anything inside of a taxable account, but there are no withdrawal requirements either. You can pull the money out whenever you need it, but you can also let it build for as long as you want; any taxable assets that your heirs inherit from you will receive a step-up in basis, too. And while you'll need to invest after-tax dollars in the account, you'll owe capital gains taxes (lower than ordinary income taxes, and 0% for investors in the 10% and 15% income tax brackets) when you sell.
As attractive as all of that flexibility is, the tax benefits conferred by IRAs and company retirement plans usually make up for any extra costs or other drawbacks associated with those plans, especially for investors with longer time horizons.
© Copyright 2017 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.